linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/9] gpio/nomadik: use typesafe __io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120423091733.GJ24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:17:34 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@...ricsson.com>,
	Jonas Aberg <jonas.aberg@...ricsson.com>,
	Philippe LANGLAIS <philippe.langlais@...ricsson.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] gpio/nomadik: use typesafe __io_address()

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:14:42AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> 
> We were using a custom io_p2v() (physical-to-virtual) translation
> macro, but with the advent of the cross-platform __io_address()
> let us try to get rid of this. Inspired by a similar patch by
> Jonas Aberg.

Is there any point to io_p2v() or __io_address() anymore?  Won't ioremap()
do here?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/