| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1335175949.28150.109.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:12:29 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
cfriesen@...tel.com, oleg@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
darren@...art.com, johan.eker@...csson.com, p.faure@...tech.ch,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
michael@...rulasolutions.com, fchecconi@...il.com,
tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it, nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it,
luca.abeni@...tn.it, dhaval.giani@...il.com, hgu1972@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@...ux.it,
insop.song@...csson.com, liming.wang@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE data structures.
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 11:55 +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 04/23/2012 11:49 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 11:47 +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >> On 04/23/2012 11:08 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 09:14 +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >>>> +struct sched_dl_entity {
> >>>> + struct rb_node rb_node;
> >>>> + int nr_cpus_allowed;
> >>>
> >>> I think it would be all-round best to move
> >>> sched_rt_entity::nr_cpus_allowed out next to cpus_allowed.
> >>
> >> You mean unify them: a single nr_cpus_allowed after
> >> task_struct::cpus_allowed, right?
> >
> > Yes, no point in keeping that one value twice and in fact there's a
> > usage of p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed in sched/fair.c so its past time its
> > moved out of that rt specific thing.
>
> Sure. Since this is a small change, probably not strictly related to
> this patchset, may I wait to see the change in mainline?
Ok..
---
Subject: sched: Move nr_cpus_allowed out of sched_rt_entity
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Date: Mon Apr 23 12:11:21 CEST 2012
Since nr_cpus_allowed is used outside of sched/rt.c and wants to be
used outside of there more, move it to a more natural site.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-gba0fya9qv86mo5m1cjf7f0v@git.kernel.org
---
arch/blackfin/kernel/process.c | 2 +-
include/linux/init_task.h | 2 +-
include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/rt.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/blackfin/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/blackfin/kernel/process.c
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ asmlinkage int bfin_clone(struct pt_regs
unsigned long newsp;
#ifdef __ARCH_SYNC_CORE_DCACHE
- if (current->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == num_possible_cpus())
+ if (current->nr_cpus_allowed == num_possible_cpus())
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(smp_processor_id()));
#endif
--- a/include/linux/init_task.h
+++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ extern struct cred init_cred;
.normal_prio = MAX_PRIO-20, \
.policy = SCHED_NORMAL, \
.cpus_allowed = CPU_MASK_ALL, \
+ .nr_cpus_allowed= NR_CPUS, \
.mm = NULL, \
.active_mm = &init_mm, \
.se = { \
@@ -157,7 +158,6 @@ extern struct cred init_cred;
.rt = { \
.run_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.rt.run_list), \
.time_slice = RR_TIMESLICE, \
- .nr_cpus_allowed = NR_CPUS, \
}, \
.tasks = LIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.tasks), \
INIT_PUSHABLE_TASKS(tsk) \
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1234,7 +1234,6 @@ struct sched_rt_entity {
struct list_head run_list;
unsigned long timeout;
unsigned int time_slice;
- int nr_cpus_allowed;
struct sched_rt_entity *back;
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
@@ -1299,6 +1298,7 @@ struct task_struct {
#endif
unsigned int policy;
+ int nr_cpus_allowed;
cpumask_t cpus_allowed;
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4957,7 +4957,7 @@ void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_str
p->sched_class->set_cpus_allowed(p, new_mask);
cpumask_copy(&p->cpus_allowed, new_mask);
- p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed = cpumask_weight(new_mask);
+ p->nr_cpus_allowed = cpumask_weight(new_mask);
}
/*
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2703,7 +2703,7 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *
int want_sd = 1;
int sync = wake_flags & WF_SYNC;
- if (p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
+ if (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
return prev_cpu;
if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) {
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -274,13 +274,16 @@ static void update_rt_migration(struct r
static void inc_rt_migration(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
+ struct task_struct *p;
+
if (!rt_entity_is_task(rt_se))
return;
+ p = rt_task_of(rt_se);
rt_rq = &rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq)->rt;
rt_rq->rt_nr_total++;
- if (rt_se->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
+ if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
rt_rq->rt_nr_migratory++;
update_rt_migration(rt_rq);
@@ -288,13 +291,16 @@ static void inc_rt_migration(struct sche
static void dec_rt_migration(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
+ struct task_struct *p;
+
if (!rt_entity_is_task(rt_se))
return;
+ p = rt_task_of(rt_se);
rt_rq = &rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq)->rt;
rt_rq->rt_nr_total--;
- if (rt_se->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
+ if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
rt_rq->rt_nr_migratory--;
update_rt_migration(rt_rq);
@@ -1161,7 +1167,7 @@ enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct ta
enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags & ENQUEUE_HEAD);
- if (!task_current(rq, p) && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
+ if (!task_current(rq, p) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
inc_nr_running(rq);
@@ -1225,7 +1231,7 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p,
cpu = task_cpu(p);
- if (p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
+ if (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
goto out;
/* For anything but wake ups, just return the task_cpu */
@@ -1260,9 +1266,9 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p,
* will have to sort it out.
*/
if (curr && unlikely(rt_task(curr)) &&
- (curr->rt.nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
+ (curr->nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
curr->prio <= p->prio) &&
- (p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)) {
+ (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)) {
int target = find_lowest_rq(p);
if (target != -1)
@@ -1276,10 +1282,10 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p,
static void check_preempt_equal_prio(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
- if (rq->curr->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
+ if (rq->curr->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
return;
- if (p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed != 1
+ if (p->nr_cpus_allowed != 1
&& cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, p, NULL))
return;
@@ -1395,7 +1401,7 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *
* The previous task needs to be made eligible for pushing
* if it is still active
*/
- if (on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
+ if (on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
}
@@ -1408,7 +1414,7 @@ static int pick_rt_task(struct rq *rq, s
{
if (!task_running(rq, p) &&
(cpu < 0 || cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p))) &&
- (p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1))
+ (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1))
return 1;
return 0;
}
@@ -1464,7 +1470,7 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_st
if (unlikely(!lowest_mask))
return -1;
- if (task->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
+ if (task->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
return -1; /* No other targets possible */
if (!cpupri_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpupri, task, lowest_mask))
@@ -1586,7 +1592,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_pus
BUG_ON(rq->cpu != task_cpu(p));
BUG_ON(task_current(rq, p));
- BUG_ON(p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed <= 1);
+ BUG_ON(p->nr_cpus_allowed <= 1);
BUG_ON(!p->on_rq);
BUG_ON(!rt_task(p));
@@ -1793,9 +1799,9 @@ static void task_woken_rt(struct rq *rq,
if (!task_running(rq, p) &&
!test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr) &&
has_pushable_tasks(rq) &&
- p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1 &&
+ p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 &&
rt_task(rq->curr) &&
- (rq->curr->rt.nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
+ (rq->curr->nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
rq->curr->prio <= p->prio))
push_rt_tasks(rq);
}
@@ -1817,7 +1823,7 @@ static void set_cpus_allowed_rt(struct t
* Only update if the process changes its state from whether it
* can migrate or not.
*/
- if ((p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1) == (weight > 1))
+ if ((p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1) == (weight > 1))
return;
rq = task_rq(p);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists