[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120423105726.GD1720@m.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:57:26 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf stat: useless output for raw events with new event
parser
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:45:34PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the new event parser, one can express raw events field by field:
>
> $ perf stat -e cpu/event=0x3c,umask=0x0/,cpu/event=0xc5,umask=0x0/ noploop 1
>
> The problem with this is that the output of perf stat becomes useless:
>
> $ perf stat -e cpu/event=0x3c,umask=0x0/,cpu/event=0xc5,umask=0x0/ noploop 1
> noploop for 1 seconds
>
> Performance counter stats for 'noploop 1':
>
> 2395038678 pmu
> 10787 pmu
> ^^^^^^
> 1.000802603 seconds time elapsed
>
> We lose the event names or encoding completely. Now for all events
> expressed via this
> new syntax , all we see is 'pmu'. That is pretty useless. It is hard
> to decrypt the results
> without some serious scripting.
>
> Not sure how to solve this given how the parser works. This looks like
> a regression to me.
I dont think thats regression, since you use new way to express an event.
Please check my answer in the other reply to Peter.
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists