[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1335193719.28150.171.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:08:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>,
Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Our failure on tracing tools unification (Was: Re: [RFC][PATCH
00/15] tools: Unify perf and trace-cmd trace event format parsing v2)
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:47 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Ingo doesn't seem to want this library outside perf in order to avoid
> the fragmentation of the efforts on tracing tools.
I really don't see the point.. parsing /debug/tracing/events/*/format
gunk really is separate, furthermore things like powertop et al already
are separate projects and really need this lib.
I mean, who gives a bother where all that crap lives, if its in the
kernel tree its all close enough to keep an eye on.. its not like
kernel/events/ and kernel/trace/ are the same directory.
Ingo, please could you lighten up and let people get stuff done? Merging
the two implementations, wherever the result lives, is a better
situation that two dis-joint implementations. So either let Frederic
work or do it yourself but don't hand-wave and road-block stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists