[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1335199347-13926-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:42:23 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, patches@...aro.org,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: List-debug variants of rcu list routines.
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
* Make __list_add_rcu check the next->prev and prev->next pointers
just like __list_add does.
* Make list_del_rcu use __list_del_entry, which does the same checking
at deletion time.
Has been running for a week here without anything being tripped up,
but it seems worth adding for completeness just in case something
ever does corrupt those lists.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rculist.h | 7 ++++++-
lib/list_debug.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h
index d079290..a20c050 100644
--- a/include/linux/rculist.h
+++ b/include/linux/rculist.h
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
* This is only for internal list manipulation where we know
* the prev/next entries already!
*/
+#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST
static inline void __list_add_rcu(struct list_head *new,
struct list_head *prev, struct list_head *next)
{
@@ -38,6 +39,10 @@ static inline void __list_add_rcu(struct list_head *new,
rcu_assign_pointer(list_next_rcu(prev), new);
next->prev = new;
}
+#else
+extern void __list_add_rcu(struct list_head *new,
+ struct list_head *prev, struct list_head *next);
+#endif
/**
* list_add_rcu - add a new entry to rcu-protected list
@@ -108,7 +113,7 @@ static inline void list_add_tail_rcu(struct list_head *new,
*/
static inline void list_del_rcu(struct list_head *entry)
{
- __list_del(entry->prev, entry->next);
+ __list_del_entry(entry);
entry->prev = LIST_POISON2;
}
diff --git a/lib/list_debug.c b/lib/list_debug.c
index 982b850..3810b48 100644
--- a/lib/list_debug.c
+++ b/lib/list_debug.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/rculist.h>
/*
* Insert a new entry between two known consecutive entries.
@@ -75,3 +76,24 @@ void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
entry->prev = LIST_POISON2;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(list_del);
+
+/*
+ * RCU variants.
+ */
+void __list_add_rcu(struct list_head *new,
+ struct list_head *prev, struct list_head *next)
+{
+ WARN(next->prev != prev,
+ "list_add_rcu corruption. next->prev should be "
+ "prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
+ prev, next->prev, next);
+ WARN(prev->next != next,
+ "list_add_rcu corruption. prev->next should be "
+ "next (%p), but was %p. (prev=%p).\n",
+ next, prev->next, prev);
+ new->next = next;
+ new->prev = prev;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(list_next_rcu(prev), new);
+ next->prev = new;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_add_rcu);
--
1.7.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists