[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1335212466.2463.85.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:21:06 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
Cc: Lesław Kopeć <leslaw.kopec@...za-klasa.pl>,
Aman Gupta <aman@...1.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>,
Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Inconsistent load average on tickless kernels
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 12:57 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Lesław Kopeć wrote:
>
> > 2.6.32.55-hz-0f004f5a69 9.88
> > 2.6.32.55-no-hz-74f5187ac8 2.48
> > 2.6.32.55-no-hz-c308b56b53 2.22
> > 3.0.28-hz 10.66
> > 3.0.28-no-hz 0.60
> > 3.0.28-no-hz-c308b56b53 4.09
> > 3.0.28-no-hz-c308b56b53 nohz=off 6.78
> > 3.2.12-hz 10.16
> > 3.2.12-no-hz 0.66
> > 3.2.12-no-hz-c308b56b53 4.36
> >
> > What's worth noting is that I haven't seen any nasty side effects of the
> > latest patch on all kernel versions that I've tested. Hope that helps.
>
> Ok.
>
> Peter, do you think it would make sense to add c308b56b53987 to 3.0.y
> and newer stable kernels?
If anybody is still maintaining those and cares enough to do the work,
sure whatever.. ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists