[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120423203924.GB13075@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:39:24 -0700
From: greg <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: yan <clouds.yan@...il.com>
Cc: kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
message <message.get@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4][Trivial] lib/kobject.c : Check parameter in
kobject_set_name
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 05:31:24PM +0800, yan wrote:
> kobject_set_name is exported and is just a wrapper for kobject_set_name_vargs
> which does not check its parameter kobj.
> So check this parameter in kobject_set_name.
I have the same objection to this patch, why is it needed? All
in-kernel users do this properly, so the patch isn't needed.
Remember, kernel programming isn't always about being defensive.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists