linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] e1000e: 82574 also needs ASPM L1 completely disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:11:19 -0700
From:	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To:	Chris Boot <bootc@...tc.net>
Cc:	<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <nix@...eri.org.uk>,
	<carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] e1000e: 82574 also needs ASPM L1 completely
 disabled

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:29:36 +0100
Chris Boot <bootc@...tc.net> wrote:
> Please note I haven't as-yet tested this code at all, but I do know that
> disabling ASPM L1 on these NICs (using setpci) fixes the hangs that I
> have been seeing on my Supermicro servers with X9SCL-F boards. I hope to
> get the chance to install an updated kernel on my two afftected servers
> later this week.
> 
> Chris Boot (2):
>   e1000e: Disable ASPM L1 on 82574
>   e1000e: Remove special case for 82573/82574 ASPM L1 disablement

Thanks Chris, we are going to take a look over the patches and Jeff
Kirsher should apply them to our internal testing tree.

Please let us know the results of your testing, we will let you know if
we see any issues as well.

Jesse

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (835 bytes)