[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120423070838.GC30752@lizard>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:08:38 -0700
From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] powerpc: Use clear_tasks_mm_cpumask()
Current CPU hotplug code has some task->mm handling issues:
1. Working with task->mm w/o getting mm or grabing the task lock is
dangerous as ->mm might disappear (exit_mm() assigns NULL under
task_lock(), so tasklist lock is not enough).
We can't use get_task_mm()/mmput() pair as mmput() might sleep,
so we must take the task lock while handle its mm.
2. Checking for process->mm is not enough because process' main
thread may exit or detach its mm via use_mm(), but other threads
may still have a valid mm.
To fix this we would need to use find_lock_task_mm(), which would
walk up all threads and returns an appropriate task (with task
lock held).
clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() has all the issues fixed, so let's use it.
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
---
arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_nohash.c | 11 ++---------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_nohash.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_nohash.c
index 5b63bd3..e779642 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_nohash.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_nohash.c
@@ -333,9 +333,7 @@ static int __cpuinit mmu_context_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
unsigned int cpu = (unsigned int)(long)hcpu;
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
- struct task_struct *p;
-#endif
+
/* We don't touch CPU 0 map, it's allocated at aboot and kept
* around forever
*/
@@ -358,12 +356,7 @@ static int __cpuinit mmu_context_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
stale_map[cpu] = NULL;
/* We also clear the cpu_vm_mask bits of CPUs going away */
- read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- for_each_process(p) {
- if (p->mm)
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(p->mm));
- }
- read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(cpu);
break;
#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
}
--
1.7.9.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists