linux-kernel - RE: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the dma-mapping tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:50:53 +0200
From:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To:	'Stephen Rothwell' <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the dma-mapping tree

Hi Stephen,

On Monday, April 23, 2012 8:50 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-post-merge tree got a conflict in
> mm/page_alloc.c between commit ac77c4123661 ("mm: trigger page reclaim in
> alloc_contig_range() to stabilise watermarks") from the dma-mapping tree
> and commit "mm: add extra free kbytes tunable" from the akpm tree.
> 
> Just context changes.  I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry
> the fixes as necessary.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
> 
> diff --cc mm/page_alloc.c
> index 0e1c6f5,decfbf0..0000000
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@@ -5032,9 -4988,17 +5044,10 @@@ static void setup_per_zone_lowmem_reser
>   	calculate_totalreserve_pages();
>   }
> 
>  -/**
>  - * setup_per_zone_wmarks - called when min_free_kbytes changes
>  - * or when memory is hot-{added|removed}
>  - *
>  - * Ensures that the watermark[min,low,high] values for each zone are set
>  - * correctly with respect to min_free_kbytes.
>  - */
>  -void setup_per_zone_wmarks(void)
>  +static void __setup_per_zone_wmarks(void)
>   {
>   	unsigned long pages_min = min_free_kbytes >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10);
> + 	unsigned long pages_low = extra_free_kbytes >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10);
>   	unsigned long lowmem_pages = 0;
>   	struct zone *zone;
>   	unsigned long flags;
> @@@ -5074,16 -5041,13 +5090,18 @@@
>   			 * If it's a lowmem zone, reserve a number of pages
>   			 * proportionate to the zone's size.
>   			 */
> - 			zone->watermark[WMARK_MIN] = tmp;
> + 			zone->watermark[WMARK_MIN] = min;
>   		}
> 
> - 		zone->watermark[WMARK_LOW]  = min_wmark_pages(zone) + (tmp >> 2);
> - 		zone->watermark[WMARK_HIGH] = min_wmark_pages(zone) + (tmp >> 1);
> + 		zone->watermark[WMARK_LOW]  = min_wmark_pages(zone) +
> + 					low + (min >> 2);
> + 		zone->watermark[WMARK_HIGH] = min_wmark_pages(zone) +
> + 					low + (min >> 1);
>  +
>  +		zone->watermark[WMARK_MIN] += cma_wmark_pages(zone);
>  +		zone->watermark[WMARK_LOW] += cma_wmark_pages(zone);
>  +		zone->watermark[WMARK_HIGH] += cma_wmark_pages(zone);
>  +
>   		setup_zone_migrate_reserve(zone);
>   		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
>   	}

The fix looks fine, thanks for merging those patches.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/