[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1335248967.2397.8.camel@Abyss>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:29:27 +0200
From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@...ux.it>
To: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, cfriesen@...tel.com,
oleg@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
johan.eker@...csson.com, p.faure@...tech.ch,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
michael@...rulasolutions.com, fchecconi@...il.com,
nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it, luca.abeni@...tn.it,
dhaval.giani@...il.com, hgu1972@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, insop.song@...csson.com,
liming.wang@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE policy implementation.
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 00:25 +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > The idea is that ->clock_task gives the time as observed by schedulable
> > tasks and excludes other muck.
>
> so clock_task might be better to compute the consumed budget at task
> deschedule, but for setting deadlines one period ahead in the future
> guess the regular wall-time rq->clock is the one to be used?
>
Yep, that was the idea, unless my recollection has completely gone
flaky! :-P
Perhaps adding a comment saying right this thing above, as Peter
suggested?
Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists