[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1335228915.28106.129.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:55:15 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ktest.pl: Fix combined usage of BISECT_REVERSE and
BISECT_SKIP
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:15 -0700, Russ Dill wrote:
> When BISECT_REVERSE and BISECT_SKIP are used together with boot or test testing,
> build failures are treated as boot or test failures and 'git bisect bad' is executed instead
> of 'git bisect skip'. This is because the $ret value of -1 is treated as a build failure, but
> the $reverse_bisect logic does not properly handle this.
>
> Simple fix, don't invert $ret if it is -1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...com>
> ---
> tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl b/tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl
> index 95d6a6f..5221b00 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl
> +++ b/tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl
> @@ -2192,7 +2192,7 @@ sub run_bisect {
> }
>
> # Are we looking for where it worked, not failed?
> - if ($reverse_bisect) {
> + if ($reverse_bisect && $ret != -1) {
Thanks! But can you resend with the following change:
... && $ret >= 0) {
Just incase we have $ret be another negative number for something else.
-- Steve
> $ret = !$ret;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists