linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuld: Implement oldmodconfig

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F96705C.5030901@suse.cz>
Date:	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:20:28 +0200
From:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuld: Implement oldmodconfig

Dne 24.4.2012 02:59, Eric W. Biederman napsal(a):
> 
> While verifying that my user namespace patches are as complete as I
> expect them to be I came a came across the need to build kernel
> configurations with a few choice settings disabled and everything else
> enabled.  Adding a make oldmodconfig made generating those
> configurations straight forward, as now I can set the options I care
> about and the oldmodconfig can answering everything else for me in a
> consistent way.

Doesn't

KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG=base.config make allmodconfig

do the same thing? If not, the difference should be explained in the
changelog.

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/