[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F96C2CF.5070900@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:12:15 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: mtk.manpages@...il.com
CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
linux-man@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
kosaki.motohiro@...il.com
Subject: Re: Bad error return after find_vma() in PR_SET_MM code
(4/15/12 12:00 AM), Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> [Bother! Resending with corrected subject line (was "[PATCH 1/2]
> prctl: Add PR_SET_MM option description")]
>
> Cyrill,
>
> While reviewing your patch to the prctl() manual page, I noticed the
> following code in kernel/sys.c::prctl_set_mm():
>
> if (opt != PR_SET_MM_START_BRK&& opt != PR_SET_MM_BRK) {
> /* It must be existing VMA */
> if (!vma || vma->vm_start> addr)
> goto out;
> }
>
> At this point, the code causes an exit with error set to zero (i.e.,
> success). This looks unintended to me. Is the code correct? I suspect
> a return of -EFAULT or -ENOMEM is warranted.
EFAULT please when detecting invalid vma.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists