linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] TPM: be silent if disabled or deactivated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1335283446.1469.6.camel@t41.thuisdomein>
Date:	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:04:06 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Debora Velarde <debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Marcel Selhorst <m.selhorst@...rix.com>,
	tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] TPM: be silent if disabled or deactivated

On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:47 -0300, Rajiv Andrade wrote:
> [...], we do want to trigger this as an error in case a faulty
> hardware claims to be functional after the tpm_do_selftest(), but decides
> to return this error code when already registered. I'll modify
> tpm_do_selftest() to handle these two scenarios. 

If you think your patch needs some testing (against v3.3.x) feel free to
send something my way.

By the way, would anyone know whether a patch that suppresses unneeded
error messages qualify for stable (once it is in Linus' tree, of
course)?


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/