linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd/tps65910: fix section mismatch in linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F96D1C1.7060701@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:16:01 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Gerard Snitselaar <dev@...tselaar.org>
CC:	sameo@...ux.intel.com, ldewangan@...dia.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd/tps65910: fix section mismatch in linux-next

On 04/24/2012 09:13 AM, Gerard Snitselaar wrote:
> tps65910_i2c_probe() calls tps65910_sleepinit() which is annnotated __init.

> -static int tps65910_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> +static int __init tps65910_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,

Shouldn't this be __devinit not __init?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/