[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120424.110518.434300178.d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:05:18 +0900 (JST)
From: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>
To: andi@...stfloor.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Enter 2nd kernel with BSP
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Enter 2nd kernel with BSP
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 03:49:15 -0700
>> Split logic into BSP's and AP's: BSP waits for AP halting.
>>
>> Don't remove variable crashing_cpu for debugging use; useful for
>> determining one what CPU crash happens.
>
> Fenghua has this patchkit to allow offlining the BSP. What happens then?
>
> It would be good to understand why initializing APs from other APs
> should not work. Not aware of such a limitation in x86.
>
> AFAIK when we online a random cpu after boot there is no effort to do it
> from BSP. Why does that work and not from the kexec boot?
>
Hello Andi,
I have yet to test what I explain here, so I'm sorry I say these with
``would''.
APs to APs case would be entirely my misunderstanding. The problematic
case would be APs to BSP case only.
native_cpu_up avoids to wake up cpu with boot_cpu_physical_apicid, but
the boot_cpu_physical_apicid would be just a boot cpu now, which could
be non-BSP on the 2nd kernel; equal to crashing cpu on the 1st
kernel. It would need to check explicitly whether a given cpu is BSP
or not and this would be better fix here. This is suggested by Eric.
Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists