[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120424174154.GB14017@mail.hallyn.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:41:54 +0000
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/43] userns: Use uid_eq gid_eq helpers when comparing
kuids and kgids in the vfs
Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@...ssion.com):
> "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com> writes:
>
> > Quoting Eric W. Beiderman (ebiederm@...ssion.com):
> >> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/attr.c | 8 ++++----
> >> fs/exec.c | 10 +++++-----
> >> fs/fcntl.c | 6 +++---
> >> fs/ioprio.c | 4 ++--
> >> fs/locks.c | 2 +-
> >> fs/namei.c | 8 ++++----
> >> include/linux/quotaops.h | 4 ++--
> >> 7 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >>
>
> >> @@ -2120,7 +2120,7 @@ void do_coredump(long signr, int exit_code, struct pt_regs *regs)
> >> if (__get_dumpable(cprm.mm_flags) == 2) {
> >> /* Setuid core dump mode */
> >> flag = O_EXCL; /* Stop rewrite attacks */
> >> - cred->fsuid = 0; /* Dump root private */
> >> + cred->fsuid = GLOBAL_ROOT_UID; /* Dump root private */
> >
> > Sorry, one more - can this be the per-ns root uid? The coredumps should
> > be ok to belong to privileged users in the namespace right?
>
> I'm not certain it was clear when you were looking at this that
> this is about dumping core from suid applications, not normal
> applications.
Right, that makes sense, but I was thinking we could just find the
root uid for the namespace in which current_euid() is valid.
Waiting is fine :)
> Looking at the code in commoncap and commit_creds it looks like it is a
> bug that we don't call set_dumpable(new, suid_dumpable) in common cap
That sounds like a bug, yes.
> when we use file capabilities. I might be wrong but I think we escape
> the test in commit_creds in that case.
>
>
> Having thought about it we can make this per namespace but not in
> this patch.
>
> Things that I see as missing.
> - We likely need to make the suid_dumpable sysctl per namespace.
> There is a prctl so it is already per process.
> - We would need to capture the user_namespace at mm creation time,
> during exec, so we know which root user we could use.
>
> By it's nature we know an mm can't escape a user namespace so the
> user namespace an mm is created in will have a root user we can
> dump core as.
>
> I was wondering if we could relax this to a uid captured at mm creation
> time (and certainly we can capture the root user), but there are enough
> weird cases I don't think it is possible to safely allow anything more
> relaxed that the root of the user_namespace that created the mm.
>
> I don't believe we can't use the user_namespace of current because the
> application may have been suid and then cloned a new user namespace
> keeping the mm or perhaps just the uid/euid split.
>
> So in short it is doable but a little tricky so it doesn't belong in
> a patch with a bunch of boring and safe conversions.
>
> Eric
Thanks for elaborating on that. Makes sense to wait.
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists