[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120424195901.GC3628@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:59:02 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Hiroshi DOYU <hdoyu@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: tegra: Add SMMU enabler in AHB
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:05:15PM +0300, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
> +#define AHB_ARBITRATION_XBAR_CTRL_SMMU_INIT_DONE_DONE 1
> +#define AHB_ARBITRATION_XBAR_CTRL_SMMU_INIT_DONE_SHIFT 17
> +
> struct __tegra_ahb {
> void __iomem *regs;
> struct device *dev;
> @@ -95,6 +98,21 @@ static inline void gizmo_writel(unsigned long value, unsigned long offset)
> writel(value, tegra_ahb->regs + offset);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC
> +
> +void tegra_ahb_enable_smmu(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long val;
> +
> + val = gizmo_readl(AHB_ARBITRATION_XBAR_CTRL);
> + val |= AHB_ARBITRATION_XBAR_CTRL_SMMU_INIT_DONE_DONE <<
> + AHB_ARBITRATION_XBAR_CTRL_SMMU_INIT_DONE_SHIFT;
In addition to what Felipe said...
Why do you need two constants where you have only one use point?
What's wrong with having just a single definition which gives you
the right bitmask?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists