[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120424200929.GC30172@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:09:29 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] i2c: Add generic I2C multiplexer using pinctrl API
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/pinctrl-i2cmux.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +Pinctrl-based I2C Bus Mux
> +
> +This binding describes an I2C bus multiplexer that uses pin multiplexing to
> +route the I2C signals, and represents the pin multiplexing configuration
> +using the pinctrl device tree bindings.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: pinctrl-i2cmux
From what I know, compatible-properties should not be linux-specific
since devicetrees are OS independent. pinctrl-i2cmux sounds
linux-specific to me.
So, is such a binding acceptable meanwhile?
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists