[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F9722CA.80403@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:01:46 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Xen Devel <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Rob Lee <rob.lee@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: clean up time
On 04/22/2012 11:48 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:20:09 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
<sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Can people please clean up stuff in their trees that has been merged by
>> their upstream. This is especially useful where the upstream merged (or
>> applied) a slightly different version of their tree.
>
> There is still much cruft in the linux-next included trees ... The
> following trees appear empty (relative to Linus' tree) but cause conflicts:
>
> bjdooks-i2c
> xen
> dma-buf
> cpuidle-cons
Are you pulling from xen.git upstream/xen? I just updated it to be
current Linus master, so it shouldn't conflict any more.
Thanks,
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists