[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4F973D2B.7000205@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:54:19 +0900
From: Minho Ban <mhban@...sung.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Prevent wasting time to find out get_parent_ip
On 04/25/2012 03:16 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 21:36 +0900, Minho Ban wrote:
>> trace_preempt_on/off looks empty if PREEMPT_TRACER is off. But actually it is
>> spending time to find out get_parent_ip(even CALLER_ADDR for some ARCH) which is
>> in argument. This seems not fair for those who expect to do nothing but increase
>> or decrease count.
>>
>
> Yuck what an ugly patch. Please don't uglify the C code with #ifdefs!
>
Yes, I agree.
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Minho Ban <mhban@...sung.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/ftrace.h | 3 ---
>> kernel/sched/core.c | 5 ++++-
>> kernel/softirq.c | 3 ++-
>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h
>> index 72a6cab..7cd11fe 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h
>> @@ -484,9 +484,6 @@ static inline void __ftrace_enabled_restore(int enabled)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER
>> extern void trace_preempt_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1);
>> extern void trace_preempt_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1);
>> -#else
>> - static inline void trace_preempt_on(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { }
>> - static inline void trace_preempt_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { }
>
> If you want to hide the "CALLER_ADDR" for other archs, then simply do:
>
> # define trace_preempt_on(a0, a1) do { } while (0)
> # define trace_preempt_off(a0, a1) do { } while (0)
>
> and be done with it.
>
> Oh, you should add a comment before these defines to the effect of:
>
> /*
> * Use defines instead of static inlines because some arches will make
> * code out of the CALLER_ADDR, when we really want these to be a real
> * nop.
> */
>
> That way, you will document why we use defines instead of static
> inlines.
>
> -- Steve
>
Very appreciate your explanation and detailed(even complete) sample code.
I'll apply your code.
>> #endif
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index 4603b9d..efdd5a0 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -3068,8 +3068,10 @@ void __kprobes add_preempt_count(int val)
>> DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON((preempt_count() & PREEMPT_MASK) >=
>> PREEMPT_MASK - 10);
>> #endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER
>> if (preempt_count() == val)
>> trace_preempt_off(CALLER_ADDR0, get_parent_ip(CALLER_ADDR1));
>> +#endif
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_preempt_count);
>>
>> @@ -3088,9 +3090,10 @@ void __kprobes sub_preempt_count(int val)
>> !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_MASK)))
>> return;
>> #endif
>> -
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER
>> if (preempt_count() == val)
>> trace_preempt_on(CALLER_ADDR0, get_parent_ip(CALLER_ADDR1));
>> +#endif
>> preempt_count() -= val;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(sub_preempt_count);
>> diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
>> index 671f959..e7c8336 100644
>> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
>> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
>> @@ -112,9 +112,10 @@ static void __local_bh_disable(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
>> if (softirq_count() == cnt)
>> trace_softirqs_off(ip);
>> raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
>> -
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER
>> if (preempt_count() == cnt)
>> trace_preempt_off(CALLER_ADDR0, get_parent_ip(CALLER_ADDR1));
>> +#endif
>> }
>> #else /* !CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS */
>> static inline void __local_bh_disable(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists