[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120425103744.GT24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:37:44 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Lothar Wa??mann <LW@...O-electronics.de>,
viresh kumar <viresh.linux@...il.com>, sshtylyov@...sta.com,
spear-devel@...t.st.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, mturquette@...aro.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jgarzik@...hat.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 07/12] ata/sata_mv: Remove conditional compilation
of clk code
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:31:09AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > If an arch has HAVE_CLK enabled it must provide valid clocks (be it
> > dummy clocks) for all devices it supports.
>
> So, lets take the theoretical exaple of a unicore32 PUV3
>
> config ARCH_PUV3
> def_bool y
> select CPU_UCV2
> select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> select HAVE_CLK
> select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
>
> Seems like this somewhat unknown, to me at least, architecture, also
> supports PCI. So i plug in an HP Adaptec AIC8120 SATA host bus adapter
> into a spare PCI slot. This uses the Marvell 88SX6041, which the
> SATA_MV driver supports.
>
> Should i expect that the unicore32 PUV3 has created a dummy clk for
> this case?
Are you going to bother answering the detailed email I sent describing
my POV on this case?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists