linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 16/23] slab: provide kmalloc_no

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F975703.3080005@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:44:35 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
CC:	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, fweisbec@...il.com,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/23] slab: provide kmalloc_no_account

(2012/04/23 8:53), Glauber Costa wrote:

> Some allocations need to be accounted to the root memcg regardless
> of their context. One trivial example, is the allocations we do
> during the memcg slab cache creation themselves. Strictly speaking,
> they could go to the parent, but it is way easier to bill them to
> the root cgroup.
> 
> Only generic kmalloc allocations are allowed to be bypassed.
> 
> The function is not exported, because drivers code should always
> be accounted.
> 
> This code is mosly written by Suleiman Souhlal.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
> CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> CC: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>


Seems reasonable.
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>

Hmm...but can't we find the 'context' in automatic way ?

-Kame

> ---
>  include/linux/slab_def.h |    1 +
>  mm/slab.c                |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/slab_def.h b/include/linux/slab_def.h
> index 06e4a3e..54d25d7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/slab_def.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab_def.h
> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ extern struct cache_sizes malloc_sizes[];
>  
>  void *kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *, gfp_t);
>  void *__kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags);
> +void *kmalloc_no_account(size_t size, gfp_t flags);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TRACING
>  extern void *kmem_cache_alloc_trace(size_t size,
> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index c4ef684..13948c3 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -3960,6 +3960,29 @@ void *__kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kmalloc);
>  
> +static __always_inline void *__do_kmalloc_no_account(size_t size, gfp_t flags,
> +						     void *caller)
> +{
> +	struct kmem_cache *cachep;
> +	void *ret;
> +
> +	cachep = __find_general_cachep(size, flags);
> +	if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(cachep)))
> +		return cachep;
> +
> +	ret = __cache_alloc(cachep, flags, caller);
> +	trace_kmalloc((unsigned long)caller, ret, size,
> +		      cachep->buffer_size, flags);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +void *kmalloc_no_account(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> +{
> +	return __do_kmalloc_no_account(size, flags,
> +				       __builtin_return_address(0));
> +}
> +
>  void *__kmalloc_track_caller(size_t size, gfp_t flags, unsigned long caller)
>  {
>  	return __do_kmalloc(size, flags, (void *)caller);



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/