linux-kernel - Re: load balancing regression since commit 367456c7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:56:03 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>, Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: load balancing regression since commit 367456c7

On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 19:33 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> OK, I'll go stare at the cgroup part then.. Thanks!
> 
Ok, I could reproduce when using cgroups, the below fixes it for me, can
you confirm?

---
Subject: sched: Fix more load-balance fallout
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Date: Tue Apr 17 13:38:40 CEST 2012

Commits 367456c756a6 ("sched: Ditch per cgroup task lists for
load-balancing") and 5d6523ebd ("sched: Fix load-balance wreckage")
left some more wreckage.

By setting loop_max unconditionally to ->nr_running load-balancing
could take a lot of time on very long runqueues (hackbench!). So keep
the sysctl as max limit of the amount of tasks we'll iterate.

Furthermore, the min load filter for migration completely fails with
cgroups since inequality in per-cpu state can easily lead to such
small loads :/

Furthermore the change to add new tasks to the tail of the queue
instead of the head seems to have some effect.. not quite sure I
understand why.

Combined these fixes solve the huge hackbench regression reported by
Tim when hackbench is ran in a cgroup.

Reported-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |   19 ++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ account_entity_enqueue(struct cfs_rq *cf
 		update_load_add(&rq_of(cfs_rq)->load, se->load.weight);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	if (entity_is_task(se))
-		list_add_tail(&se->group_node, &rq_of(cfs_rq)->cfs_tasks);
+		list_add(&se->group_node, &rq_of(cfs_rq)->cfs_tasks);
 #endif
 	cfs_rq->nr_running++;
 }
@@ -3215,6 +3215,14 @@ static int move_one_task(struct lb_env *
 
 static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p);
 
+static const unsigned int sched_nr_migrate_break =
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
+	8
+#else
+	32
+#endif
+	;
+
 /*
  * move_tasks tries to move up to load_move weighted load from busiest to
  * this_rq, as part of a balancing operation within domain "sd".
@@ -3242,7 +3250,7 @@ static int move_tasks(struct lb_env *env
 
 		/* take a breather every nr_migrate tasks */
 		if (env->loop > env->loop_break) {
-			env->loop_break += sysctl_sched_nr_migrate;
+			env->loop_break += sched_nr_migrate_break;
 			env->flags |= LBF_NEED_BREAK;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -3252,7 +3260,7 @@ static int move_tasks(struct lb_env *env
 
 		load = task_h_load(p);
 
-		if (load < 16 && !env->sd->nr_balance_failed)
+		if (sched_feat(LB_MIN) && load < 16 && !env->sd->nr_balance_failed)
 			goto next;
 
 		if ((load / 2) > env->load_move)
@@ -4407,7 +4415,7 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, st
 		.dst_cpu	= this_cpu,
 		.dst_rq		= this_rq,
 		.idle		= idle,
-		.loop_break	= sysctl_sched_nr_migrate,
+		.loop_break	= sched_nr_migrate_break,
 	};
 
 	cpumask_copy(cpus, cpu_active_mask);
@@ -4448,7 +4456,8 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, st
 		env.load_move = imbalance;
 		env.src_cpu = busiest->cpu;
 		env.src_rq = busiest;
-		env.loop_max = busiest->nr_running;
+		env.loop_max = min_t(unsigned long,
+				sysctl_sched_nr_migrate, busiest->nr_running);
 
 more_balance:
 		local_irq_save(flags);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/