| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120425210250.GA3251@fieldses.org> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:02:50 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> To: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com> Cc: "Trond.Myklebust@...app.com" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>, "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] SUNRPC: three bugfixes for PipeFS event handling On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:59:07AM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: > 25.04.2012 22:24, J. Bruce Fields написал: > >On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 06:18:59PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: > >>These bugfixes were caught (or noticed) due to the following simple script: > >I'm assuming Trond should take these (possibly for 3.4?). > > I think so. > But would be great if you'll take them as well (since I'm mostly > working with your tree). > Of course, only if its not a big deal for you. > But if there will be any conflicts - then don't worry. I can just > keep these patches in my repo. If it's a bugfix that should go to 3.4, then best might be for Trond to get it merged, then I'll pull it into my tree after that. Or I'm happy to do it some other way if someone prefers. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists