[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJe_ZhdyqJVDvXCs_sw_SeB4Hfds+jRfj7JJp0VgG8j+XsXhZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:40:48 +0530
From: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...ricsson.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mattias WALLIN <mattias.wallin@...ricsson.com>,
Jonas ABERG <jonas.aberg@...ricsson.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Keep boot_on regulators powered during init
On 26 April 2012 14:05, Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 09:04:01PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't the bootloader be responsible for ensuring MMC is
>> put down after using it and before passing control to the kernel.
>
> You might want to try to ensure that bootloaders always do the right
> thing but I prefer to work on more achievable goals like world peace. :/
>
>From what Ulf described so far, I am not sure if even gagging the regulator
api could be seen as a foolproof solution to the problem - he still doesn't
account for the necessary 'power-down sequence of commands' without
which the eMMC might fail attempts by the mmc stack to reset and initialize.
Appeasements and treaties could help achieve peace, I am just not sure
if former is a good option this time :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists