[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F991FF1.6000007@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:14:09 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
CC: <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>, <tobias.geiger@...o.info>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: use the pirq number to check the pirq_eoi_map
On 25/04/12 16:11, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> In pirq_check_eoi_map use the pirq number rather than the Linux irq
> number to check whether an eoi is needed in the pirq_eoi_map.
What buggy behaviour does this patch fix? It would be nice if this was
included in the patch description.
David
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
> Tested-by: Tobias Geiger <tobias.geiger@...o.info>
> ---
> drivers/xen/events.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
> index 4b33acd..0a8a17c 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static unsigned int cpu_from_evtchn(unsigned int evtchn)
>
> static bool pirq_check_eoi_map(unsigned irq)
> {
> - return test_bit(irq, pirq_eoi_map);
> + return test_bit(pirq_from_irq(irq), pirq_eoi_map);
> }
>
> static bool pirq_needs_eoi_flag(unsigned irq)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists