[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120426132608.GA10368@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:26:08 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, swhiteho@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Get rid of I_MUTEX_QUOTA use
On Wed 25-04-12 17:25:32, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:57:41PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > this patch set changes generic quota code (and filesystems relying on it)
> > so that they don't use special locking class I_MUTEX_QUOTA. The only remaining
> > user of I_MUTEX_QUOTA is GFS2. If noone has objections, I can merge these
> > patches through my tree or Bruce, you can take them as your work depends
> > on these changes.
>
> My changes will likely need to go through Al, and depend on GFS2 being
> fixed as well.
>
> So it's up to Al. Best might be to just merge it through your tree and
> let us sort it out in the next merge window?
OK, I've added patches to my tree for now. I also sent a patch for GFS2
but after some investigation that's mostly a cleanup grade and Steven can
merge it independently. Quota inode in GFS2 is hidden system file so there
should be no locking problems with it wrt your patches.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists