[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120426142643.GA18863@alpha.arachsys.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:26:43 +0100
From: Richard Davies <richard.davies@...stichosts.com>
To: Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"jweiner@...hat.com" <jweiner@...hat.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"lwoodman@...hat.com" <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
"shaohua.li@...el.com" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
"dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] avoid swapping out with swappiness==0
Satoru Moriya wrote:
> > I have run into problems with heavy swapping with swappiness==0 and
> > was pointed to this thread (
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=133522782307215 )
>
> Did you test this patch with your workload?
I haven't yet tested this patch. It takes a long time since these are
production machines, and the bug itself takes several weeks of production
use to really show up.
Rik van Riel has pointed out a lot of VM tweaks that he put into 3.4:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=133536506926326
My intention is to reboot half of our machines into plain 3.4 once it is
out, and half onto 3.4 + your patch.
Then we can compare behaviour.
Will your patch apply cleanly on 3.4?
Richard.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists