[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F996433.7040003@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:05:23 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] perf evlist: Fix creation of cpu map
On 4/25/12 11:15 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Currently, 'perf record -- sleep 1' creates a cpu map for all online
> cpus since it turns out calling cpu_map__new(NULL). Fix it. Also it
> is guaranteed that cpu_list is NULL if PID/TID is given by calling
> perf_target__validate(), so we can make the conditional bit simpler.
>
> This also fixes perf test 7 (Validate) failure on my 6 core machine:
>
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online
> 0-11
> $ ./perf test -v 7
> 7: Validate PERF_RECORD_* events& perf_sample fields:
> --- start ---
> perf_evlist__mmap: Operation not permitted
> ---- end ----
> Validate PERF_RECORD_* events& perf_sample fields: FAILED!
Works fine for me with latest tip:
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online
0-15
$ /tmp/perf/perf test -v 7
7: Validate PERF_RECORD_* events & perf_sample fields:
--- start ---
64740167922229 0 PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE
64740167926354 0 PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE
64740167928389 0 PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE
64740167930832 0 PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE
64740168404145 0 PERF_RECORD_COMM: sleep:16523
64740168424672 0 PERF_RECORD_MMAP 16523/16523: [0x400000(0x6000) @ 0]:
/bin/sleep
64740168441676 0 PERF_RECORD_MMAP 16523/16523: [0x7f83de5bb000(0x224000)
@ 0]: /lib64/ld-2.14.90.so
64740168458460 0 PERF_RECORD_MMAP 16523/16523: [0x7fff009ff000(0x1000) @
0x7fff009ff000]: [vdso]
64740168586358 0 PERF_RECORD_MMAP 16523/16523: [0x7f83de203000(0x3b8000)
@ 0]: /lib64/libc-2.14.90.so
64741168625653 0 PERF_RECORD_EXIT(16523:16523):(16523:16523)
---- end ----
Validate PERF_RECORD_* events & perf_sample fields: Ok
Is the failure a by-product of the other patches in this set?
David
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim<namhyung.kim@....com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> index a43e2c56d1c6..556d98af1a0b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> @@ -608,8 +608,9 @@ int perf_evlist__create_maps(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
> if (evlist->threads == NULL)
> return -1;
>
> - if (target->uid != UINT_MAX ||
> - (target->cpu_list == NULL&& target->tid))
> + if (target->uid != UINT_MAX || target->tid)
> + evlist->cpus = cpu_map__dummy_new();
> + else if (!target->system_wide&& target->cpu_list == NULL)
> evlist->cpus = cpu_map__dummy_new();
> else
> evlist->cpus = cpu_map__new(target->cpu_list);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists