linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/23] kmem slab accounting basic infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F989207.5080208@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:08:39 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
CC:	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/23] kmem slab accounting basic infrastructure

(2012/04/25 23:38), Glauber Costa wrote:

> On 04/24/2012 10:32 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>> (2012/04/21 6:57), Glauber Costa wrote:
>>
>>> This patch adds the basic infrastructure for the accounting of the slab
>>> caches. To control that, the following files are created:
>>>
>>>   * memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes
>>>   * memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes
>>>   * memory.kmem.failcnt
>>>   * memory.kmem.max_usage_in_bytes
>>>
>>> They have the same meaning of their user memory counterparts. They reflect
>>> the state of the "kmem" res_counter.
>>>
>>> The code is not enabled until a limit is set. This can be tested by the flag
>>> "kmem_accounted". This means that after the patch is applied, no behavioral
>>> changes exists for whoever is still using memcg to control their memory usage.
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, res_counter never goes naeative ?
> 
> Why would it?
> 
> This one has more or less the same logic as the sock buffers.
> 
> If we are not accounted, the caches don't get created. If the caches
> don't get created, we don't release them. (this is modulo bugs, of course)

Okay. Please note how the logic works in description or Doc. 
It's a bit complicated part.

Thanks,
-Kame


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/