[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALWz4iyKDcrLoK4Dtnwwq6OvDAiEyb72iV6dezwKmoZWhkVDSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:33:36 -0700
From: Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8] Eliminate task stack trace duplication
++cc x86 people which I forgot this time ..
--Ying
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 04/06/2012 02:45 PM, Ying Han wrote:
>>
>> The problem with small dmesg ring buffer like 512k is that only limited
>> number
>> of task traces will be logged. Sometimes we lose important information
>> only
>> because of too many duplicated stack traces. This problem occurs when
>> dumping
>> lots of stacks in a single operation, such as sysrq-T.
>>
>> This patch tries to reduce the duplication of task stack trace in the dump
>> message by hashing the task stack. The hashtable is a 32k pre-allocated
>> buffer
>> during bootup. Each time if we find the identical task trace in the task
>> stack,
>> we dump only the pid of the task which has the task trace dumped. So it is
>> easy
>> to back track to the full stack with the pid.
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ying Han<yinghan@...gle.com>
>
>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
>
> --
> All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists