[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1335474828.2136.15.camel@shrek.rexursive.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:13:48 +1000
From: Bojan Smojver <bojan@...ursive.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Per Olofsson <pelle@...ian.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11]: Hibernation: fix the number of pages used for
hibernate/thaw buffering
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 22:00 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> No, I didn't requested that. There's nothing like stable-only patches,
> we only backport mainline commits to -stable.
Yeah, you told me that my patch was not straightforward, so I broke off
part of it for -stable that would fix just the most critical problem.
> > This patch should go to linux-next:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133426808115262&w=2
>
> OK
>
> So I'll include it into my v3.5 push and I don't want to hear about how
> urgent it is any more. Is that clear enough?
Look, I created a problem on some people's computer in 3.2. I feel
responsible for fixing it. I do not want their computers to hang because
of something I wrote, especially if there is a fix.
So, if I will say one more time. This patch is a fix for a regression,
caused by me, since 3.2. Please ask -stable maintainers to include it in
version in 3.2 and above.
If you want me to create a set of patches instead and then you backport
just one, let me know. I will do whatever is necessary to fix this
regression.
--
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists