linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] bug: completely remove code of disabled VM_BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120426153241.6d4762a2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:32:41 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] bug: completely remove code of disabled VM_BUG_ON()

On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:40:32 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 13:26, Konstantin Khlebnikov
> <khlebnikov@...nvz.org> wrote:
> > Even if CONFIG_DEBUG_VM=n gcc genereates code for some VM_BUG_ON()
> 
> That's because of the side effects of the expression
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/25/146
> 
> But IRIC, we do want them here?
> 

AFAICT (lkml.org appears to be having a meltdown), you've gone and
linked to this very thread.

Please try again, this time avoiding hyperlinks ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/