linux-kernel - RE: [TMP] OMAP3EVM: Test gpmc nand & smsc911x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93E970122@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 05:21:45 +0000
From:	"Mohammed, Afzal" <afzal@...com>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:	"Hilman, Kevin" <khilman@...com>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"grinberg@...pulab.co.il" <grinberg@...pulab.co.il>,
	"mike@...pulab.co.il" <mike@...pulab.co.il>,
	"Menon, Nishanth" <nm@...com>,
	"artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com" <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
	"vimal.newwork@...il.com" <vimal.newwork@...il.com>,
	"dbaryshkov@...il.com" <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [TMP] OMAP3EVM: Test gpmc nand & smsc911x

Hi Tony,

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 22:17:26, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Obviously we can't merge any of this if until all the board-*.c files
> are changed and tested.
> 
> Can you maybe still keep the old interfaces in addition to the new ones
> so we can do the conversion one board-*.c file at a time while keeping
> things working?

As there are peripherals using helper functions, to handle those, you
meant to create a new altered similar function to deal for each too ?,
while keeping existing functions as such.

i.e. like having gpmc_smsc911x_init & gpmc_smsc911x_new_init for
each peripheral ?, with gpmc_smsc911x_new_init using gpmc driver,
and gpmc_smsc911x_init as is.

Regards
Afzal


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/