lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:14:16 +1000
From:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: twl4030 power button: don't lose presses on
 resume

On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:26:03 +1000 NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de> wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:09:19 -0700 Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Neil,
> > 
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:21:39PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > 
> > > If we press and release the power button before the press interrupt is
> > > handled - as can happen on resume - we lose the press event so the
> > > release event is ignored and we don't know what happened to cause the
> > > wakeup.
> > 
> > What kind of latency do you observe?
> 
> When I have debugging enabled, hundreds of milliseconds.
> 
> When I don't have debugging enabled ... it doesn't tell me, but I'm fairly
> sure it is several tens of milliseconds and the button press can be quicker
> than that.
> 
> If it will help I can try to instrument the driver and get some timings.

I added a bit of tracing.

It looks like a fast button press typically shows about 120ms between 'press'
and 'release', though I have seen as low as 70ms.
When I don't have PM_DEBUG debugging on, the 'press' interrupt gets handled
in about 14ms.
So it seems likely that the times that I suffered from the problem and so
wrote the patch, I had PM_DEBUG enabled which slows resume down quite a lot.

So I cannot make a strong case for these patches.  However I think it is
safer to have them than not :-)

Thanks,
NeilBrown

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ