[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F9AA84D.8090604@parallels.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:08:13 +0400
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
CC: "Trond.Myklebust@...app.com" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] SUNRPC: check rpcbind clients usage counter before
decrement
On 27.04.2012 17:55, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 05:37:49PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> Registering service with svc_bind() can fail. In this case service will be
>> destroyed and during destruction it will try to unregister itself from rpcbind.
>> In this case unregister have to be skipped.
>
> Isn't this a preexisting bug, in which case perhaps Trond should at it
> to his list of bugs to submit now?
>
Not it's not.
Previously, in case of bind operations failure, rpcb_put_local() wasn't called,
but service data was destroyed instead:
- if (svc_uses_rpcbind(serv)) {
- if (svc_rpcb_setup(serv, current->nsproxy->net_ns) < 0) {
- kfree(serv->sv_pools);
- kfree(serv);
- return NULL;
- }
- if (!serv->sv_shutdown)
- serv->sv_shutdown = svc_rpcb_cleanup;
- }
Now (with svc_bind() introduction) service can be created, but svc_bind() could
fail. And thus svc_destroy() have to be called. Which will call rpcb_put_local().
And the problem here that svc_bind() can fail before incrementing of rpcb usage
counter.
> --b.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbursky@...allels.com>
>>
>> ---
>> net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c | 12 +++++++-----
>> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c
>> index 78ac39f..4c38b33 100644
>> --- a/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c
>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c
>> @@ -180,14 +180,16 @@ void rpcb_put_local(struct net *net)
>> struct sunrpc_net *sn = net_generic(net, sunrpc_net_id);
>> struct rpc_clnt *clnt = sn->rpcb_local_clnt;
>> struct rpc_clnt *clnt4 = sn->rpcb_local_clnt4;
>> - int shutdown;
>> + int shutdown = 0;
>>
>> spin_lock(&sn->rpcb_clnt_lock);
>> - if (--sn->rpcb_users == 0) {
>> - sn->rpcb_local_clnt = NULL;
>> - sn->rpcb_local_clnt4 = NULL;
>> + if (sn->rpcb_users) {
>> + if (--sn->rpcb_users == 0) {
>> + sn->rpcb_local_clnt = NULL;
>> + sn->rpcb_local_clnt4 = NULL;
>> + }
>> + shutdown = !sn->rpcb_users;
>> }
>> - shutdown = !sn->rpcb_users;
>> spin_unlock(&sn->rpcb_clnt_lock);
>>
>> if (shutdown) {
>>
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists