lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:07:48 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/4] perf/annotate loop detection V2, fixes

Em Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:48:57PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 12:31 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Yeah, there are some unused graphical chars. But perhaps we should just
> > use ↓ again?
> > 
> >      0.00 │┌─→ c0:    cmp    %rax,%rbx
> >      0.00 ││          mov    %rax,%rcx
> >      0.00 ││      ↓   ↓je    5dd
> >      0.00 ││   cc:    test   %rcx,%rcx
> >      0.00 ││      ↓   ↓je    da
> >      0.00 ││          mov    0x8(%rcx),%esi
> >      0.00 ││          shr    $0x4,%esi
> >      0.00 ││          sub    $0x2,%esi
> >      0.00 ││   da:    mov    %rcx,0x10(%rbx)
> >      0.00 ││          mov    %rcx,%rax
> >      0.00 ││          cmpl   $0x0,%fs:0x18
> >      0.00 ││      ↓   ↓je    ed
> >      0.00 ││          lock   cmpxchg %rbx,(%rdx)
> >      0.00 ││          cmp    %rax,%rcx
> >           ││
> >      0.00 │└──────↑ } jne    c0
> > 
> > Does it still stands out? I think so, we expect a letter there,
> > something very different is there, matching the other down arrowsome
> > columns to the left. 
> 
> That just looks daft.. what's wrong with the single up/down arrow?

Yeah, that too, or perhaps we can bring the instruction column closer to
the jump column and then that makes it stand out better?
 
> Also, can we keep all this on the list please?

 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Is doing the trick with keeping the arrows, etc, readable here, I'll
check what is wrong with git-send-email that corrupted the messages when
I tried using it to post patches.

- Arnaldo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ