[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120427171146.B18373E0B4D@localhost>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:11:46 -0600
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, vinod.koul@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi/spi-ep93xx.c: use dma_transfer_direction instead of dma_data_direction
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:46:36 -0700, H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com> wrote:
> A new enum indicating the dma channel direction was introduced by:
>
> commit 49920bc66984a512f4bcc7735a61642cd0e4d6f2
> dmaengine: add new enum dma_transfer_direction
>
> The following commit changed spi-ep93xx to use the new enum:
>
> commit a485df4b4404379786c4bdd258bc528b2617449d
> spi, serial: move to dma_transfer_direction
>
> In doing so a sparse warning was introduced:
>
> warning: mixing different enum types
> int enum dma_data_direction versus
> int enum dma_transfer_direction
>
> This is produced because the 'dir' passed in ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare
> is an enum dma_data_direction and is being used to set the
> dma_slave_config 'direction' which is now an enum dma_transfer_direction.
>
> Fix this by converting spi-ep93xx to use the new enum type in all
> places.
>
> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...ux.intel.com>
Applied, thanks.
g.
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
> index 6db2887..e805507 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
> @@ -545,13 +545,12 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_pio_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
> * in case of failure.
> */
> static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
> -ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_data_direction dir)
> +ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
> {
> struct spi_transfer *t = espi->current_msg->state;
> struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *txd;
> enum dma_slave_buswidth buswidth;
> struct dma_slave_config conf;
> - enum dma_transfer_direction slave_dirn;
> struct scatterlist *sg;
> struct sg_table *sgt;
> struct dma_chan *chan;
> @@ -567,14 +566,13 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_data_direction dir)
> memset(&conf, 0, sizeof(conf));
> conf.direction = dir;
>
> - if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
> + if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
> chan = espi->dma_rx;
> buf = t->rx_buf;
> sgt = &espi->rx_sgt;
>
> conf.src_addr = espi->sspdr_phys;
> conf.src_addr_width = buswidth;
> - slave_dirn = DMA_DEV_TO_MEM;
> } else {
> chan = espi->dma_tx;
> buf = t->tx_buf;
> @@ -582,7 +580,6 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_data_direction dir)
>
> conf.dst_addr = espi->sspdr_phys;
> conf.dst_addr_width = buswidth;
> - slave_dirn = DMA_MEM_TO_DEV;
> }
>
> ret = dmaengine_slave_config(chan, &conf);
> @@ -633,8 +630,7 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_data_direction dir)
> if (!nents)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - txd = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(chan, sgt->sgl, nents,
> - slave_dirn, DMA_CTRL_ACK);
> + txd = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(chan, sgt->sgl, nents, dir, DMA_CTRL_ACK);
> if (!txd) {
> dma_unmap_sg(chan->device->dev, sgt->sgl, sgt->nents, dir);
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> @@ -651,12 +647,12 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct ep93xx_spi *espi, enum dma_data_direction dir)
> * unmapped.
> */
> static void ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(struct ep93xx_spi *espi,
> - enum dma_data_direction dir)
> + enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
> {
> struct dma_chan *chan;
> struct sg_table *sgt;
>
> - if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
> + if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
> chan = espi->dma_rx;
> sgt = &espi->rx_sgt;
> } else {
> @@ -677,16 +673,16 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
> struct spi_message *msg = espi->current_msg;
> struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *rxd, *txd;
>
> - rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(espi, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> + rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
> if (IS_ERR(rxd)) {
> dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "DMA RX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(rxd));
> msg->status = PTR_ERR(rxd);
> return;
> }
>
> - txd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(espi, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + txd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(espi, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
> if (IS_ERR(txd)) {
> - ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> + ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
> dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "DMA TX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(rxd));
> msg->status = PTR_ERR(txd);
> return;
> @@ -705,8 +701,8 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct ep93xx_spi *espi)
>
> wait_for_completion(&espi->wait);
>
> - ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> - ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> + ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
> + ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(espi, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
> }
>
> /**
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists