[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120427172731.GD26595@google.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:27:31 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
ShuoX Liu <shuox.liu@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu, x86: don't use PMD_SIZE as embedded atom_size
on 32bit
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:17:17AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/27/2012 09:53 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> > + /*
> > + * If PSE is available, use PMD_SIZE for atom_size so that
> > + * embedded percpu areas are aligned to PMD. This, in the
> > + * future, can also allow using PMD mappings in vmalloc
> > + * area. Use PAGE_SIZE on 32bit as vmalloc space is highly
> > + * contended and large vmalloc area alloc can easily fail.
> > + */
> > + atom_size = PAGE_SIZE;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > + if (cpu_has_pse)
> > + atom_size = PMD_SIZE;
> > +#endif
>
> Just make it PAGE_SIZE on i386 and PMD_SIZE on x86-64; keep the behavior
> consistent. !cpu_has_pse on x86-64 is an abnormal situation (I think it
> applies to Xen, pretty much.)
>
> Other than that,
>
> Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Yeah, that's simpler. Will update.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists