[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+1xoqc+283VNm6Ai7O9LCQk_12K6jpXUGKwKe7sTJff3cuX_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:05:15 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: async pf: INFO: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 04:50:35PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I got a "INFO: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected"
> > warning
> > while running LTP inside a KVM guest using the recent -next kernel.
> >
> > It seems that it was initially originated from rcu_torture_rea(), but I
> > don't think that it's a problem with RCU itself (I'll cc. Paul just in
> > case). RCU torture was indeed configured to run during the testing.
>
> I might be missing something, but I don't see how RCU is involved in
> this one.
It happened due to a rcutorture thread:
[ 4248.579019] rcu_torture_rea/1615 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying
to acquire:
[ 4248.579019] (pgd_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81089476>] pgd_free+0x26/0xa0
rcutorture has never triggered anything on my tests up until now, and
is probably not responsible for the actual warning in this case, just
figured I should cc you in case I'm wrong :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists