[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120427.151651.2274764174217164454.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:16:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mjt@....msk.ru, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
autofs@...r.kernel.org, raven@...maw.net, thomas@...3r.de,
stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce a version6 of autofs interface, to fix
design error.
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:14:33 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:55:12 -0700
>
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Linus Torvalds
>> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> There's no question that systemd is broken.
>>
>> Actually, I'll take that back.
>>
>> Yes, systemd has breakage. But it's actually automount that is the
>> truly broken piece of sh*t.
>>
>> I think that 'automount' is even more broken. The fact that the
>> automount maintainers knew about this, and added TOTALLY BROKEN code
>> to their automount source tree, over five years ago, because the
>> authors clearly did not understand what the f*ck they were doing,
>> that's the real problem.
>
> I respectfully disagree.
BTW, I want to clarify that my position is that userland might have
been the best place to handle this rather than the kernel.
I fully recognize that the automountd test is busted on ppc, sparc,
et al.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists