[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120427213759.GS26595@google.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:37:59 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] res_counter: Merge res_counter_charge and
res_counter_charge_nofail
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:11:35AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> These two functions do almost the same thing and duplicate some code.
> Merge their implementation into a single common function.
> res_counter_charge_locked() takes one more parameter but it doesn't seem
> to be used outside res_counter.c yet anyway.
>
> There is no (intended) change in the behaviour.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>
Applied to cgroup/for-3.5. Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists