linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Reduce cache-miss initialization latencies for large systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1335501371.10374.30.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 06:36:11 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josh@...htriplett.org,
	niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Reduce cache-miss
 initialization latencies for large systems

On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 09:42 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: 
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Commit #0209f649 (rcu: limit rcu_node leaf-level fanout) set an upper
> limit of 16 on the leaf-level fanout for the rcu_node tree.  This was
> needed to reduce lock contention that was induced by the synchronization
> of scheduling-clock interrupts, which was in turn needed to improve
> energy efficiency for moderate-sized lightly loaded servers.
> 
> However, reducing the leaf-level fanout means that there are more
> leaf-level rcu_node structures in the tree, which in turn means that
> RCU's grace-period initialization incurs more cache misses.  This is
> not a problem on moderate-sized servers with only a few tens of CPUs,

With a distro config (4096 CPUs) interrupt latency is bad even on a
quad.  Traversing empty nodes taking locks and cache misses hurts.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/