[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1335652949.20866.14.camel@pasglop>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 08:42:29 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in 32-bit ppc kernel
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 08:41 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 13:09 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > I have done a little more debugging. The problem is definitely coming
> > from
> > drivers/tty/serial/pmac_zilog.c. I am getting ChanB interrupts while
> > open, which
> > causes the following code segment to return IRQ_NONE:
> >
> > if (r3 & (CHBEXT | CHBTxIP | CHBRxIP)) {
> > if (!ZS_IS_OPEN(uap_a)) {
> > pmz_debug("ChanB interrupt while open !\n");
> > goto skip_b;
> > }
> > write_zsreg(uap_b, R0, RES_H_IUS);
> > zssync(uap_b);
> > if (r3 & CHBEXT)
> >
> > When this section is entered, r3 == 0x2 (CHBTxIP).
> >
> >
> Ok. The debug code was meant to spell "while not open" btw :-)
>
> I have some ideas what's going on. I think the irda stuff can trigger
> interrupts during the open/close sequence before ZS_IS_OPEN is true.
>
> I'll send a fix.
Hrm, actually, Andreas also found an actual bug here, as we aren't
testing uap_b but uap_a ... oops. I think when I tested chan b I always
had chan a open :-) That will be easy to fix.
Can you try turning the uap_a to uap_b test above and see if that fixes
some of it for you ?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists