[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F9B7BBA.7030504@openvz.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:10:18 +0400
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] bug: mark disabled BUG() as unreachable() code
Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> This patch suppress some compiler warnings (if CONFIG_BUG=n)
> "warning: control reaches end of non-void function"
With this patch gcc throw out loop at the end of do_exit():
schedule();
BUG();
/* Avoid "noreturn function does return". */
for (;;)
cpu_relax(); /* For when BUG is null */
Is this ok? Probably not, and we need here some BUG_NORETURN() which
really never returns even if CONFIG_BUG=n.
>
> Plus now gcc can throw out some dead code.
> bloat-o-meter: add/remove: 1/1 grow/shrink: 68/173 up/down: 1569/-5607 (-4038)
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/bug.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bug.h b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> index aadb6fc..0b08199 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ extern void warn_slowpath_null(const char *file, const int line);
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_BUG */
> #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> -#define BUG() do {} while(0)
> +#define BUG() unreachable()
> #endif
>
> #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists