[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120428085223.GB26065@aftab.osrc.amd.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:52:23 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@...hat.com>,
Doug Thompson <norsk5@...oo.com>,
Mark Gross <mark.gross@...el.com>,
Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@...mai.com>,
Tim Small <tim@...tersideup.com>,
Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@...ztechnologies.com>,
"Arvind R." <arvino55@...il.com>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Egor Martovetsky <egor@...emi.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund@...csson.com>,
Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@...escale.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH EDACv16 1/2] edac: Change internal representation to work
with layers
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:07:38PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Yes. This is a common issue at the EDAC core: on several places, it calls the
> edac debug macros (DEBUGF0...DEBUGF4) passing a __func__ as an argument, while
> the debug macros already handles that. I suspect that, in the past, the __func__
> were not at the macros, but some patch added it there, and forgot to fix the
> occurrences of its call.
The patch that added it is d357cbb445208 and you reviewed it.
> This is something that needs to be reviewed at the entire EDAC core (and likely
> at the drivers).
Looks like a job for a newbie to get her/his feet wet with kernel work.
> I opted to not touch on this at the existing debug logic, as I think that the
> better is to address all those issues on one separate patch, after fixing the
> EDAC core bugs.
No,
you simply need to remove the __func__ argument in your newly added debug call:
debugf2("%s: %d: dimm%zd (%d:%d:%d): row %d, chan %d\n", __func__,
i, (dimm - mci->dimms),
pos[0], pos[1], pos[2], row, chn);
And while you're at it, remove the rest of the __func__ arguments from
your newly added debugfX calls.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists