linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce a version6 of autofs interface, to fix design error.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFxnksj5fL68XzkGPQ+aQc0pif+5jjxD=LjGcxKUt039xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:17:34 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, mjt@....msk.ru,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, autofs@...r.kernel.org,
	raven@...maw.net, thomas@...3r.de, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce a version6 of autofs interface, to fix
 design error.

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:03 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
> Still, I have to admit... we have a grand total of three users of this
> interface as far as we know (autofs, systemd, and am-utils if they ever
> revved that one to v5.)  Would it really not be better to do the
> zero-eating user space fix?

Considering the sh*t that is in user space now, and how distributions
tend to take years (if ever) to actually update some programs, I don't
see how that would actually work in practice.

                   Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/