[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F9CF191.5020607@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:45:21 +0400
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, autofs@...r.kernel.org,
raven@...maw.net, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce a version6 of autofs interface, to fix design
error.
[Hit "reply" instead of "Reply to all".. I'm sorry for a repost]
On 29.04.2012 11:19, Linus Torvalds wrote:
[]
>> /proc/1/fdinfo/16 -- the autofs pipe fd# -- shows flags=02004000
>> which is O_CLOEXEC|O_NONBLOCK, but this is the other end of the
>> pipe.. shouldn't the READ side of the pipe have O_DIRECT flag now?
>
> Gaah, it should, but it won't.
>
> I bet my original patch worked fine, because the pipe has only one
> inode and pipe structure. But it has *two* 'struct file's associated
> with it, and autofs only ever sees the writing side, and never gets to
> mark the reading side O_DIRECT. So yeah, the reading side won't do the
> proper packetized read.
Can't we go - in kernel - from one struct file to pipe structure to
another file structure and set O_DIRECT there? Autofs kernel code
checks if the file descriptor is a pipe, so it should be possible...
Thanks,
/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists